The New York Times Just Published The Case For Removing Trump
In a revealing and blistering opinion column published in The New York Times on Saturday, columnist David Leonhardt made a compelling case for removing President Donald Trump from office, not just by impeachment —which “would probably rally the president’s supporters”— but by first conducting a series of “sober-minded hearings to highlight Trump’s misconduct” for the public to see. This, Leonhardt argues, would put Trump’s Republican allies “in a very difficult spot.”
As noted by Leonhardt, the endless chaos that Trump creates can sometimes obscure the big picture. But the big picture is simple: The United States has never had a president as demonstrably unfit for the office as Trump. And it’s becoming clear that 2019 is likely to be dominated by a single question: What are we going to do about it?
From The Times:
The easy answer is to wait—to allow the various investigations of Trump to run their course and ask voters to deliver a verdict in 2020. That answer has one great advantage. It would avoid the national trauma of overturning an election result. Ultimately, however, waiting is too dangerous. The cost of removing a president from office is smaller than the cost of allowing this president to remain.
He has already shown, repeatedly, that he will hurt the country in order to help himself. He will damage American interests around the world and damage vital parts of our constitutional system at home. The risks that he will cause much more harm are growing…
The biggest risk may be that an external emergency—a war, a terrorist attack, a financial crisis, an immense natural disaster—will arise. By then, it will be too late to pretend that he is anything other than manifestly unfit to lead.
For the country’s sake, there is only one acceptable outcome, just as there was after Americans realized in 1974 that a criminal was occupying the Oval Office. The president must go.
The “misconduct” Leonhardt refers to does not include Trump’s ideology, his alleged collusion with Russia, or even “his lazy approach to the job”—Trump’s refusal to read briefing books and the “many empty hours on his schedule.”
Instead, Leonhardt breaks down the president’s “negligence and perfidy” into four categories: His use of the presidency for personal enrichment, his violations of campaign finance law, his obstruction of justice, and his subversion of democracy.
Leonhardt ends his column with a hopeful tone—and a call to action for Republicans.
“Finally, there is the hope—naïve though it may seem—that some Republicans will choose to act on principle. There now exists a small club of former Trump administration officials who were widely respected before joining the administration and whom Trump has sullied, to greater or lesser degrees. It includes Rex Tillerson, Gary Cohn, H.R. McMaster, and Jim Mattis. Imagine if one of them gave a television interview and told the truth about Trump. Doing so would be a service to their country at a time of national need. It would be an illustration of duty.”
Trump, throughout his career, has worked hard to invent his own reality, and largely succeeded. His lies and deception have made him very rich and, against all odds, elected him president.
But whatever happens in 2019, his false version of reality will not survive history, just as Nixon’s did not. Which side of that history do today’s Republicans want to be on?
You can read Leonhardt’s entire column here.